The identity (
Reference: Javascript Tutorial: Comparison Operators
The
To quote Douglas Crockford's excellent JavaScript: The Good Parts,
===) operator behaves identically to the equality (==) operator except no type conversion is done, and the types must be the same to be considered equal.Reference: Javascript Tutorial: Comparison Operators
The
== operator will compare for equality after doing any necessary type conversions. The === operator will not do the conversion, so if two values are not the same type === will simply return false. It's this case where === will be faster, and may return a different result than ==. In all other cases performance will be the same.To quote Douglas Crockford's excellent JavaScript: The Good Parts,
JavaScript has two sets of equality operators:===and!==, and their evil twins==and!=. The good ones work the way you would expect. If the two operands are of the same type and have the same value, then===producestrueand!==producesfalse. The evil twins do the right thing when the operands are of the same type, but if they are of different types, they attempt to coerce the values. the rules by which they do that are complicated and unmemorable. These are some of the interesting cases:
The lack of transitivity is alarming. My advice is to never use the evil twins. Instead, always use'' == '0' // false
0 == '' // true
0 == '0' // true
false == 'false' // false
false == '0' // true
false == undefined // false
false == null // false
null == undefined // true
' \t\r\n ' == 0 // true===and!==. All of the comparisons just shown producefalsewith the===operator.
Update:
A good point was brought up by @Casebash in the comments and in @Phillipe Laybaert's answer concerning reference types. For reference types== and === act consistently with one another (except in a special case).var a = [1,2,3];
var b = [1,2,3];
var c = { x: 1, y: 2 };
var d = { x: 1, y: 2 };
var e = "text";
var f = "te" + "xt";
a == b // false
a === b // false
c == d // false
c === d // false
e == f // true
e === f // trueThe special case is when you compare a literal with an object that evaluates to the same literal, due to its toString or valueOf method. For example, consider the comparison of a string literal with a string object created by the String constructor."abc" == new String("abc") // true
"abc" === new String("abc") // falseHere the == operator is checking the values of the two objects and returning true, but the === is seeing that they're not the same type and returning false. Which one is correct? That really depends on what you're trying to compare. My advice is to bypass the question entirely and just don't use the String constructor to create string objects.


0 comments:
Post a Comment